Headline for dating sites examples of thesis free dating sites guwahati
But people who go into law enforcement do so for the trill [sic] of wielding power over other people, and in this sense, they relate more to the crooks they associate with than the citizens they’re supposed to protect and serve.They’re looking to bully someone and they’re corrupt.Crimes against Americans at the hands of corrupt government agents and private security thugs have a long history in the U. The FBI’s COINTELPRO (“Counterintelligence Program”) scandal in the 1970s was the most notorious high-profile example, but similar abuses of power by “Red Squads” (state and local Law Enforcement Intelligence Units) and private detectives date back to the 19th century.You can read a full explanation of counterintelligence stalking – including an archive of published news reports on the subject – on the (November 6, 2017) reports on some clandestine operations by enforcers in the private security-intelligence business.I know that one of the victims said he was very happy and that he felt that justice was served, but I actually am disappointed in this settlement for a number of reasons.First of all, the decision is sealed, so we really don’t know if justice has been served. We don’t know if there is any kind of deterrent that has been written into the decision.Both the facts and the geographical distribution of relevant published news reports – as well as other evidence cited on this website – suggest that such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal agencies; however, news reports, credible anecdotal information, and my own experiences, indicate that such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and their clients.Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of psychological terrorism, it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment – which guarantees the right to a trial.
After a year of concerted effort, Weinstein’s campaign to track and silence his accusers crumbled.Several of the women targeted, however, said that Weinstein’s use of private security agencies deepened the challenge of speaking out.“It scared me,” Sciorra said, “because I knew what it meant to be threatened by Harvey.domestic counterintelligence operations of this type are – apparently – perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, sometimes with the support of state and local law enforcement personnel.operations of this type are, apparently, perpetrated by private investigators and vigilantes – including former agents and cops, some of whom are members of the quasi-governmental Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU), sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with connections to the public and private elements of America’s security industry.